Food Imagery and the Mastication Memorial

| 11 Comments
I have always been shocked and amazed when people we know and love take time and effort to publish -- what they're about to turn into poop -- on the public interwebs. Yes, I'm taking about the infectious internets viral phenomenon we'll call... "Food Imagery and the Mastication Memorial."

What is the point of taking a picture of your food before you eat it and then publishing it on the web? 

Do those folks find spiritual satiety in preserving the very essence of life right before they shovel it all into one hole -- only to have it later expressed out another?

Our very own Gordon Davidescu recently celebrated his ongoing mastication ritual with this image published on his Livejournal homepage

Why, Gordon, WHY?


Even our admired and respected Movable Type expert Byrne Reese recently memorialized his Tuna Melt infatuation on his blog

Why, Byrne, WHY?


If you're really going to follow through on publicizing your eating habits -- aren't you also required to provide the end image of the successful result, too? 

Why wouldn't the world want a pork chop and chitterlings "before and after" if one truly wanted to celebrate the percolating body?

Gordon and Byrne are not alone in the food fetishism -- yet it is still our want to always wonder -- "Why?"

Related Entries

11 Comments

Eeeeeek!!! TMI!!!

Actually david, the "before" looks delicious than the "after".... :-)

Katha!

I agree the before is more agreeable than the "after" -- or even the "during" -- but should we choose aesthetic over reality? If you're going to publicize the first step, aren't you required to complete the cycle of imagery?

Ummm...

David, I think at times the "aesthetic" should take over the "reality" - mostly when the reality is brutally "real"... :-)

I also think we share what we enjoy the most...it shows who is driven by what I guess...

playing a devil's advicate, may I ask - what's wrong in it?

Katha --

Your argument reminds of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. We send our troops out to fight all bright and shiny -- but, in the end, when they come home bruised and battered and in caskets, we hide that harsh reality from public view because it's "too real" to be publicly masticated. The ugly end is all part of the process -- but only the aesthetic bits are allowed for public consumption.

I don't understand the point of taking a picture of your food and publishing it on the web as content for other eyes because it adds to the overwhelming noise and fills the void with nothingness. I also don't understand hair ribbons on dogs or Twitter streams that announce what people are watching on TV.

David,

I did not intend to compare "hiding the caskets" incident with whatever we were discussing here - neither do I agree with the argument.

I understand you don't agree or understand publishing a picture of someone's food - neither do I but I let it go as a sign of someone's enjoyment...

I don't follow twitter...so I am no good judging it.

The argument I'm making, Katha, is that a celebration should be circular and not just have a start without an ending -- even if that finish is unseemly.

The way I eat, it always looks the same at the end. :) The reason I posted that photo was that it was the end result of adding different food items each day until I had the amalgamation that I digitally captured. I was wondering if anyone would be curious as to how I made it so they could make it, too.

Alas, nobody was curious.

I'm curious, Gordon! Write us up a pictorial step-by-step for one of our blogs and then we have a context in which to celebrate the end result... which then becomes your image in this article! SMILE!

How about this : Next week I will try a similar experiment and document that. Last week's experiment is currently fertilizer, alas. :P

Ha! I love your inventiveness and willingness to play along with a provocative argument, Gordon! SMILE!

Hi David,

My point is we know good thing do not last long...we do not really need to put it on a display.

@ Gordon - ufffff!!! disgustingly grotesque!!!

Leave a comment

BolesBlues.com Logo
UnitedStage.com Logo
Panopticonic.com Logo
CarceralNation.com Logo
Memeingful.com Logo
DramaticMedicine.com Logo
ScientificAesthetic.com Logo
UrbanSemiotic.com Logo
RelationShaping.com Logo
David W. Boles' WordPunk Logo Small
Boles University Logo Small
David W. Boles' Celebrity Semiotic Logo Small
10txt.com Logo
Search BolesBlogs.com Logo
Boles Books Writing and Publishing Logo Small
Hardcore ASL Logo Small
David W. Boles
Script Professor Logo Small

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by David W. Boles published on September 10, 2009 10:22 AM.

The Fish Wrangler Review was the previous entry in this blog.

Lighting Up Facebook Lite is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

  • Kathakali Chatterjee: Hi David, My point is we know good thing do read more
  • David W. Boles: Ha! I love your inventiveness and willingness to play along read more
  • Gordon Davidescu: How about this : Next week I will try a read more
  • David W. Boles: I'm curious, Gordon! Write us up a pictorial step-by-step for read more
  • Gordon Davidescu: The way I eat, it always looks the same at read more
  • David W. Boles: The argument I'm making, Katha, is that a celebration should read more
  • Kathakali Chatterjee: David, I did not intend to compare "hiding the caskets" read more
  • David W. Boles: Katha -- Your argument reminds of George W. Bush and read more
  • Kathakali Chatterjee: Ummm... David, I think at times the "aesthetic" should take read more
  • David W. Boles: Katha! I agree the before is more agreeable than the read more